Join Now

Back to all Monthly Trend Reports

“What's actually holding this together?”

September 2026 was the month the club kept looking at the load-bearing stuff nobody puts on the org chart.

Across sessions on other humans, trust, change, ethics, content, governance, money, and careers, members kept describing the quiet things that hold work together:

  • a performance someone keeps up
  • a level of trust that lets a team skip the paperwork
  • a boundary two people drew by hand years ago that is somehow still standing

Nobody was claiming these things were broken. The harder realization was how much of what we call "the system" is really people carrying it, and how little of that carrying ever gets written down.

What surprised me most was how often someone asked how to make something hold, and the answer that came back wasn't a framework or a tool. It was a relationship: an ally in engineering, a well-prepared coffee chat, a colleague who tells you before the UI changes. That's lovely. It's also a little unnerving, because relationships leave when people do.


Below is a recap of the meta themes that we saw across our discussion sessions in September. If you are interested in our upcoming discussions, check out our discussion group calendar.

 

#1 Everyone's performing, and most of it is survival

Several of our member discussions ended up looking at the gap between who people are one-on-one and who they become in front of a boss, a group meeting, or a hiring panel. Members came in frustrated with colleagues who seem to be one person in Slack and another on the call with executives, and the conversation kept turning back on itself.

The act usually turned out to be protection: a response to fear, to rent, to a family that depends on the paycheck, or to a workplace that rewards one kind of person.

The same pattern surfaced in rooms about careers and governance, where people described translating what they actually care about into whatever words the room will accept, like "speed" when what they mean is quality, just to get anything done. The tension was in holding both at once: real empathy for the performance, and a real cost to whoever has to keep it up.

"When you realize that it really is just people trying to survive in environments that weren't built for them to be themselves…" - Overheard in Making Sense of Other Humans

 

#2 Trust is the infrastructure you only notice when it's missing

Trust came up in conversations about teams, AI, and how we decide what's true.

  • In high-trust groups, people described starting work before the contract is signed, expecting a mistake to be met with support instead of punishment, and not needing to double-check each other.
  • In low-trust groups, the cost showed up as duplicated effort, with two people following up on a task one person is paid to do.

Members also noticed how much of the ambient trust that used to build itself in hallways and elevators has gone quiet as work moved onto screens. Several groups this month landed on the same unease: confidence is easy to mistake for trustworthiness, and that's as true of people as it is of machines.

"When there's high trust, it's not a gap. There's this ability to kind of glide over small gaps." - Overheard in Collaborative Sensemaking

 

#3 Is it the person or the situation?

Member discussions on change, other humans, team dynamics, and ethics all ran into the same fork: when someone won't bend, is that who they are, or the conditions they're working in?

One room used building materials as the metaphor (some of us are concrete, some are glass, some are a vine growing into the sidewalk) and then noticed how quickly that framing could become a way of blaming people for systems they didn't design.

Members talked about:

  • A difficult manager whose behavior made more sense once the fear underneath it was visible
  • A coworker who seemed to have sold out and was, years later, clearly protecting his family
  • Leaders nobody ever trained to lead.
  • There was a clear limit, too. Curiosity about why someone behaves badly isn't the same as excusing it, and sometimes the honest conclusion was that it's time to leave.

"You start to maybe blame personality when it's really a systemic change thing." - Overheard in Collaborative Sensemaking

 

#4 Things hold because someone is holding them

In rooms on content, knowledge management, governance, and systems, members kept describing structures that work only because a particular person keeps them working:

  • the boundary between help and training that held for years on a hand-drawn chart
  • the knowledge base that grew on its own with nobody curating it
  • the institutional memory that lives in one person's head.

Even an elegant system wears down without upkeep, and the upkeep is rarely funded, documented, or noticed until the person doing it leaves. Several people admitted that "governance" makes colleagues flinch, so they've learned to call it something else: sustainability, consistency, scalability. Underneath the vocabulary was a harder question about what it would take for structure to outlast the people carrying it.

"If it's not baked into the machine itself, if it can just leave with a person leaving who's keeping everything on track, then it's not durable." - Overheard in Ethics Open Mic

 

#5 Does everything have to count?

The month's most tender thread ran through the more contemplative sessions (drawing, mindfulness, play, rough maps) but also spilled into conversations about money and careers.

Members noticed how hard it has become to do anything without justifying it:

  • a hobby that "makes me better at work"
  • a career gap that needs a tidy story
  • a stretch of unemployment that apparently should have produced ten side businesses

In the sessions this month where nothing had to be finished or good, people described what showed up once they stopped overthinking: a thought that surfaced only because their hands were busy, a feeling they couldn't name until they scribbled it.

Nobody argued that productivity doesn't matter. The question was whether we've lost the ability to let something be worth doing simply because we're doing it.

"Is it possible to waste time, or if I'm enjoying myself, did I totally not waste my time?" -Overheard in Career Transitions

 


 

If these sound like discussions you wish you had been apart of or privy to, now is a great time to become a member. All new members who join in October will automatically receive a FREE ticket to Makesensemess (Oct 30 1 to 4 PM ET)

Feeling some FOMO?

If these topics are of interest, or useful to you in this season of your sensemaking — we meet every weekday at 2 PM ET to discuss a new topic. Most members join us 2 to 3 times a month, and many report feeling an "increased energy" as a result (which you can't say about most video calls, but we are proud to say about ours)

Become a Member

Gaps between our capability and our confidence create discomfort.

Take our FREE 24-question assessment to reveal the gaps in your unique sensemaker shape. 

Request the Sensemaker Assessment
The Sensemakers Club with Information Architect Abby Covert

Subscribe to our email list